Working with the Park City School District Board
A practical guide to constructive advocacy, relationship-building, and helping the district translate its welcoming values into clear operational protections for students and families.
Contents
What we are asking for
Practical next steps that build on the district's existing commitments:
- Clear multilingual family communication — proactive, standardized, and consistent across all schools when immigration-related incidents occur in the community
- A community incident response plan — safe dismissal procedures, guidance when a parent is detained, and attendance flexibility for affected students
- Student and staff education on rights and district procedures — so everyone knows what to do if enforcement occurs near school or on the way to and from campus
Steps that would formalize what Park City already values:
- A clear warrant standard — staff trained to distinguish judicial warrants from administrative ICE documents
- A written front office protocol posted at every school
- Annual staff training on ICE-specific scenarios, escalation procedures, and how to support fearful students
When and where meetings happen
Location
2700 Kearns Blvd
Park City, UT 84060
Typical schedule
Confirm current times and location at pcschools.us/board-of-education before attending — schedules can shift.
Agendas, minutes, and meeting materials are posted at BoardDocs — Park City SD. Reviewing the agenda ahead of time helps you time your comment well.
Types of meetings
- Regular meetings — formal public meetings where the board votes on agenda items and public comment is held; your primary opportunity to speak on the record
- Work sessions — working discussions between board and staff; less formal, public comment may be limited, but these conversations shape what comes to a vote
- Special meetings — called for specific topics; sometimes high-impact and worth attending even if public comment is limited
Public comment
Preparing your comment
- Confirm whether advance registration is required — do not assume walk-in sign-up is available
- Review the agenda ahead of time so you can time your comment to relevant discussion items
- Practice out loud — two to three minutes passes faster than you expect
- Write a brief outline, not a script — natural, conversational delivery is often more persuasive than reading from a page
What to expect
- The board will typically not respond during your comment — this is normal procedure, not a sign you were ignored
- Your comment is on the public record
- The board can only take formal action on items listed on the agenda
- A clear, specific ask is more actionable than a general statement of concern
A structure that works
- Thank the district for its welcoming statement and public commitments
- Share a brief, grounded story — a student's fear, a family's uncertainty, a teacher's concern
- Name the specific gap — not accusations, but a practical missing piece
- Ask for a concrete next step
What public comment is for
- Putting the issue on the public record
- Signaling organized, constructive community support
- Establishing visibility with the full board
- Opening the door to follow-up conversations
Themes that resonate in Park City
- Student emotional safety and wellbeing
- Attendance and engagement
- Family trust and predictability
- Transportation and dismissal safety
- Staff clarity and support
If you cannot attend or speak
Written input still matters. A brief, personal email to board members — especially when multiple people send similar messages — signals sustained community concern and is often read carefully.
- Contact board members directly: pcschools.us/board-of-education
- Review board meeting materials: BoardDocs — Park City SD
Meeting with board members — the most important step
Park City School District is relationship-driven. Conversations outside the board room are often where trust and momentum are built. Because the district is smaller and more accessible than large urban districts, one-on-one conversations with board members and administrators carry significant weight — more so here than in many other places.
The most effective approach is not simply to present a list of demands, but to have a genuine conversation: listening to board members' questions and concerns, sharing practical examples from other districts, and positioning yourself as a collaborative community partner.
Three ways to start a conversation
1. A brief, personal email
Board member email addresses are public. A short, professional note — thanking the district for its existing commitments and requesting a 20–30 minute conversation — is an effective first step. Be specific about what you want to discuss.
2. Through the district office
Contact the district office or superintendent's staff. They can direct you to the appropriate board member or administrator, and may be able to facilitate an introduction.
3. Before or after a board meeting
Board members are often accessible in the lobby before and after meetings. A brief, warm introduction — "I appreciated the district's welcoming statement and I'd love to talk with you sometime" — can open the door to a fuller conversation.
What to bring to a meeting
- A one-page summary of your specific ask — clear and easy to act on
- One or two concrete examples from other districts that have implemented similar policies
- A grounded story — a teacher's experience, a family's uncertainty, a student's fear — that illustrates why clarity matters
- Genuine curiosity: ask what concerns the board member has and listen carefully
Sample meeting request
How to communicate effectively
Different communication approaches serve different purposes. A combination of all four — not just showing up at meetings — is what produces lasting results.
Public comment
Purpose: visibility and record
- Puts the issue on the public record
- Signals organized, constructive community support
- Most effective when multiple people speak across multiple meetings
- Begin by acknowledging the district's existing leadership — it sets the right tone
One-on-one conversations
Purpose: trust and persuasion
- The most effective way to build genuine understanding and support
- Gives you time to share context, answer questions, and develop a working relationship
- Allows you to present materials and examples that would take too long in public comment
- In a small district like Park City, these relationships are especially valuable
Email and written communication
Purpose: follow-up and record
- Follow up after public comment or a conversation — it shows sustained, genuine interest
- A brief thank-you that reiterates your ask keeps the issue visible
- Attach a one-page summary or examples from other districts
- Creates a written record board members can reference and share internally
Coalition presence
Purpose: community breadth
- Multiple community voices aligned on the same ask signals broad, genuine support
- A visible, respectful group in the meeting room — even those not speaking — demonstrates that this is a community priority
- Educators, faith leaders, counselors, and parent groups together are far more persuasive than any single organization
Language that works in Park City
"We appreciate the district's leadership."
Acknowledge what exists before asking for what's next. It is accurate, and it positions you as a partner rather than a critic.
"Families need predictability."
Clear procedures reduce fear. Uncertainty — not enforcement itself — is often what drives absenteeism and anxiety.
"Staff deserve operational clarity."
Front office staff and teachers should not have to improvise under pressure. A written protocol supports them.
"Here is how other districts have done it."
Concrete examples from comparable districts make the ask feel practical and achievable, not theoretical.
"This is about emotional safety."
Students learn best when they feel safe. Fear and uncertainty directly affect school performance and engagement.
"Clear communication builds trust."
Families who trust the district keep their children in school. Trust is an educational outcome.
How the board makes decisions
Open meetings law
Utah's Open and Public Meetings Act requires that board deliberations happen in public. Board members cannot formally deliberate outside of a noticed meeting. The formal decision happens in public — but the conversations that shape it do not.
Board members receive information, hear from community members, and form opinions in the days and weeks before a meeting. By the time a vote happens, most board members have already developed a position. This is why relationship-building and early outreach matter more than a single well-delivered comment.
The role of staff recommendations
In most districts, the board follows the recommendation of the superintendent or district administration on operational and procedural questions. Internal allies — school counselors, equity staff, family liaisons — who already understand the problem can advocate internally in ways outside organizations cannot.
Small district dynamics
Park City is a smaller, close-knit community. Board members are neighbors, parents, and community members — not distant bureaucrats. Community reputation matters. Organized, respectful, constructive engagement from people the board knows and trusts can be remarkably effective.
This also means that tone matters significantly. An adversarial approach can damage relationships that would otherwise be productive. A collaborative approach — one that treats board members as partners rather than opponents — is both more accurate and more effective here.
Strategy for Park City specifically
Park City School District is not a resistant or indifferent district. Its public statements, counselor deployment, and "We All Belong" commitment reflect genuine care. That changes the strategic approach significantly — this is not about convincing the district to care. It is about helping it translate existing values into clear, reliable practice.
Build on existing leadership
The district has already issued a welcoming statement, publicly acknowledged family fear and anxiety, confirmed it does not collect immigration status, and affirmed its belonging values. Use this as your foundation.
Open every conversation with acknowledgment of what the district has done — then ask about the practical next step. "You've already said families are welcome. What would it look like for staff to have a written procedure for when ICE is reported nearby?"
Lead with emotional safety and wellbeing
Park City's board is likely highly responsive to student wellbeing, mental health, and emotional safety. These themes are more persuasive here than legalistic or politically framed arguments.
- Student anxiety and fear around enforcement
- Attendance impacts — even when nothing happens at school
- What teachers and counselors are already seeing
- Family trust as an educational outcome
Focus on implementation gaps
The strongest arguments in Park City are not about district values — those are already aligned. They are about the practical gaps between values and operational reality:
- No written plan for when ICE activity is reported near schools
- Transportation and dismissal procedures undefined
- No real-time family communication protocol for community incidents
- Staff improvising responses that the district hasn't documented
Bring examples from other districts
Concrete models from comparable districts make the ask feel practical and achievable. Rather than describing a problem, bring a solution the board can consider.
Examples: transportation safety policies, front office protocols, family communication templates, and incident response plans from districts that have already implemented them. Frame these as: "Here is one model Park City could adapt."
Relationship-based organizing is especially effective here
In a community as connected as Park City, organizing through trusted relationships — educators, faith leaders, school counselors, Latino parent groups, and mental health advocates — carries more weight than large-scale mobilization.
A small group of credible, respected community voices speaking with one clear ask is often more effective than a large, unfamiliar coalition.
Recognize the tourism economy context
Park City's economy relies heavily on hospitality, tourism, and service industries — sectors with significant immigrant workforce participation. Mixed-status households exist throughout the community. Community anxiety around enforcement is not limited to school buildings.
This context helps board members understand that this is not a distant or abstract issue — it affects families who are already part of the Park City community.
Core messaging for Park City
"You've already said families belong here. Now help them feel it."
Bridges the gap between values and operational reality — and it affirms the district's commitment rather than challenging it.
"Families need to know exactly what will happen — before it does."
Proactive communication and written procedures reduce fear. Uncertainty is what drives absenteeism, not enforcement itself.
"Counselors and teachers are already dealing with this."
School staff are already seeing the impact of fear and uncertainty. A written plan supports them and makes their work easier.
"This is emergency planning — the same framework as fire drills and lockdowns."
Incident response is not politically controversial. Schools plan for foreseeable disruptions. This is one more foreseeable scenario.
"ICE activity has already been reported nearby."
This is not a hypothetical. An ICE operation was confirmed in Park City in April 2026. Families are already worried. A plan helps. (KPCW)
"A small district can move quickly — that is an advantage."
Park City does not need to coordinate 90 campuses. It can adopt and implement clear procedures faster than a large district, and it should.
Choose a focus — and what to say
The most effective speakers focus on one clear angle. If multiple people are speaking, choosing different angles helps the board hear a fuller picture without repetition. Supporting data is included under each focus — you do not need to quote statistics, but they are there if you want to feel prepared or answer questions. Full citations are on the sources page.
- Require a judge-signed judicial warrant before immigration enforcement officers enter non-public school areas or remove a student
- Provide written training for front office staff so every school responds the same way — including how to tell the difference between a judicial warrant and an administrative ICE form
- Communicate clearly with families about what the district will and will not do
- Fear of enforcement leads to increased absenteeism and disengagement — direct educational outcomes the board is responsible for
- This happens even when enforcement does not occur at the school itself — community-level fear is enough to keep students home
Supporting data:
- A 2025 Stanford-led study found a 22% increase in student absences in districts experiencing increased immigration enforcement activity (Stanford / PMC)
- A national UCLA survey found 63.8% of principals reported students missing school due to immigration-related concerns, and 70.4% reported student well-being concerns tied to enforcement (UCLA Education)
- Research shows fear of enforcement alone — even without direct action at a school — can reduce attendance (Education Week)
- Without a written policy, different schools respond differently to the same situation — that is inconsistent and unfair
- Front office staff should not have to improvise a legal decision under pressure — they deserve a documented procedure
- When students feel unsafe or uncertain, it can lead to disruptions to the school environment, including missed class time
- A clear policy protects the district from legal exposure and inconsistency
Supporting data:
- Families need accurate, reliable information about what will happen — not general reassurances
- Uncertainty reduces parent engagement, which harms the school community
- Schools function best when families trust them — a clear policy builds that trust
Supporting data:
- Research shows fear and uncertainty reduce parent engagement and student participation, even among families not directly targeted (PMC)
- Enforcement impacts extend beyond directly affected students, influencing entire school communities (The Journalist's Resource)
- Approximately 5 million children in the U.S. live with at least one undocumented family member — illustrating the scale of communities that benefit from clear district policy (Urban Institute)
- Increased coordination between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities
- Growing concern in affected communities
- Schools can provide stability even when outside conditions change
- Schools are not required to allow access based on administrative ICE warrants — only judicial warrants signed by a judge compel entry (learn the difference)
- Student records are protected under FERPA — schools already have a legal obligation to restrict access without proper legal authority
- Plyler v. Doe (1982) established that all children have a right to education regardless of immigration status — districts have a duty to protect that access
- This policy would not obstruct lawful enforcement — it simply requires the same legal standard that applies to any private space
Full citations and additional research: No ICE in Schools — Sources
When enforcement activity occurs near schools
In April 2026, an ICE operation was confirmed in Park City — reported by KPCW. This is not a hypothetical. Community anxiety around enforcement activity near schools is already a real experience for some Park City families — and schools need to be prepared to respond clearly and calmly.
How prepared districts respond
1. Activate existing safety protocols
Many districts treat nearby law enforcement activity the same way they treat other external situations — move recess indoors, pause outdoor dismissal, adjust arrival procedures. The framework already exists; it just needs to extend to this scenario.
2. Centralize all staff contact
Teachers and front office staff do not engage directly with officers. All contact is routed through the principal or district office. This protects both students and staff, and ensures consistent, calm responses across the building.
3. Notify families promptly and accurately
A brief, factual, multilingual message to families — "Here is what is happening, here is what we are doing, here is what you should know" — reduces panic and keeps students in school rather than being pulled out early.
4. Adjust dismissal and transportation
Dismissal and bus stops are among the highest-risk moments — students move from a protected campus into public areas. A documented plan for when and how to adjust dismissal protects students during exactly this window.
5. Support students and staff emotionally
Counselors are already available in Park City. A clear protocol ensures they are deployed proactively — not just reactively — and that teachers know how to respond to frightened or distressed students in the moment.
6. Document and debrief
Schools log what happened, how they responded, and what should be adjusted. Documentation gives district leadership accurate information for follow-up family communication and future planning.
Why this matters for Park City
Without a documented plan:
- Staff improvise under pressure without guidance
- Families receive inconsistent or delayed information
- Students arrive or depart during an active situation without clear procedures in place
- Fear and uncertainty spread faster than facts
With a documented plan:
- Staff know exactly what to do and who to contact
- Families receive a timely, accurate, multilingual update
- Dismissal and transportation are managed safely
- Counselors are deployed proactively to support students
Coordinating with others
A well-coordinated coalition of trusted community voices carries far more weight than any individual advocate. In Park City specifically, the quality of voices matters as much as the quantity — a small group of credible, respected community members speaking with a unified, constructive ask can be very effective.
Who to involve
- Educators and school counselors — staff who see the daily impact of fear and uncertainty firsthand are among the most credible voices
- Faith leaders — across Park City's faith communities, trusted voices carry weight
- Latino parent groups and immigrant advocates — directly affected community members ground the conversation in real experience
- Mental health professionals — counselors and therapists can speak to the emotional and developmental impact of fear
- Community organizations — Peace House, Holy Cross Ministries, Park City Community Foundation, and others
Before the meeting
- Assign speaker roles: educator, parent, counselor or mental health professional, faith leader, community organization
- Each speaker covers a different angle — avoid repetition
- Agree on the specific, practical ask so all speakers are aligned
- Confirm public comment procedures and sign up in advance
- Practice individual comments out loud, timed to two minutes
During the meeting
- Sit together as a visible, calm group — presence matters even for those not speaking
- Begin each comment by thanking the district for existing commitments before describing the gap
- Stay solutions-oriented throughout — what you are asking for, not just what is missing
- Be patient and professional regardless of how the board responds in the moment
After the meeting
- Follow up with board members by email that same week — while the conversation is fresh
- Debrief as a group: what resonated, what to adjust, who to reach out to
- Request one-on-one conversations with board members who seemed engaged or curious
- Plan your next presence before leaving — consistency signals that this is a lasting community priority
Common mistakes — and how to avoid them
Leading with accusation
Park City's district has already issued a welcoming statement and publicly acknowledged family concerns. Framing your advocacy as a response to district hostility is both inaccurate and counterproductive — it damages the collaborative relationship that is your most valuable asset here.
Ignoring district strengths
Failing to acknowledge what the district has already done signals that you have not been paying attention — or that no acknowledgment will ever be enough. Always start from a place of genuine recognition before describing the gap.
Framing this as a political issue
Framing the ask around immigration policy, federal enforcement, or political opposition invites resistance. Frame it as a student safety, emotional wellbeing, and operational planning question — which is what it is.
Treating public comment as the only strategy
In a small, relationship-driven district, one-on-one conversations with board members and administrators matter more than microphone time. If you are only speaking at meetings and not building relationships between them, you are missing the most effective path.
Not following up
A single comment or meeting without follow-up rarely leads to action. Send a follow-up email. Ask for a follow-up conversation. Return to the next board meeting. Sustained, respectful presence signals that this is a lasting community priority — not a one-time concern.
Presenting a problem without a solution
In Park City, coming with a practical recommendation — a specific protocol, an example from another district, a draft communication template — is far more effective than describing a gap without proposing how to fill it. Be a resource, not just a critic.
What to expect after you speak
The board will usually not respond directly
This is normal — and it is not a sign that you were ignored. Board members in most districts are advised not to engage in extended back-and-forth with public commenters during the meeting. Your comment is on the record.
After Patron Comment, issues raised may be:
- Acknowledged briefly by the board chair
- Referred to district staff for follow-up
- Discussed informally in future study sessions
- Added to a future meeting agenda — especially if the issue comes up repeatedly
Change takes time — and consistency
A single well-delivered comment rarely produces immediate action. What produces action is a pattern: the same concern, raised by multiple credible voices, across multiple meetings, accompanied by a clear, specific ask and organized community backing.
Your action plan
Working with the board is a process, not a single meeting. Here is a practical sequence for building momentum in Park City.
-
Learn the district's current position
Read the district's public statement on immigration and its "We All Belong" commitment. Know what the district has already said before asking for what comes next. Read the statement →
-
Thank district leadership for existing commitments
Send a brief email acknowledging what the district has already done — and expressing interest in supporting the next step. This positions you as a partner, not an opponent. Find board member contacts at pcschools.us/board-of-education.
-
Request a small meeting with a board member or administrator
Ask for 20–30 minutes to discuss a specific, practical question. Bring a one-page summary and an example from another district. Listen as much as you talk.
-
Bring practical examples and recommendations
Concrete models — front office protocols, transportation plans, communication templates — make the ask feel achievable. Come as a resource, not just a voice of concern.
-
Coordinate community voices
Bring together educators, counselors, faith leaders, and parent groups around a shared, specific ask. Assign different angles to different speakers so the board hears a fuller picture without repetition.
-
Attend meetings consistently and speak on the record
Use public comment to make the ask visible and demonstrate organized community support. Begin by thanking the district, then describe the specific gap and ask for a concrete next step.
-
Follow up respectfully and persistently
Email board members after every meeting or conversation. Return the next month. Sustained, respectful engagement is what signals that this is a lasting community priority — and it is what produces results.