Utah District Scorecard

Each district is assessed against five core protections. Find your district, see the gaps, and use the next step to know what to ask for at your next school board meeting.

← Back to Utah overview

AI-generated research — verify before acting. This scorecard was produced with the assistance of AI and may contain errors or outdated information. District policies change. Before contacting your school board or making decisions based on this data, verify the current status directly with your district.
Already doing this (publicly visible)
⚠️ Partially doing this / unclear
Not in place (opportunity)
The 5 Core Protections (achievable baseline)
  1. Public Policy – District explains how it handles ICE
  2. Warrant Requirement – Requires proper legal documentation before access
  3. Front Office Protocol – Staff know what to do if ICE shows up
  4. Student Privacy – Clear protection of student information
  5. Family Communication – Families are informed and reassured
🛡
Tier 1 — Strongest Existing Models These districts have made the most progress. None are complete. The most common gaps are training, emergency protocols, and formal board adoption.

Salt Lake City School District

✅ 3 in place ⚠️ 1 partial ❌ 1 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy
Warrant Requirement⚠️
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy
Family Communication
Next step: Add a simple front office procedure + clarify warrant language

Granite School District

✅ 2 in place ⚠️ 2 partial ❌ 1 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy⚠️
Warrant Requirement⚠️
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy
Family Communication
Next step: Turn guidance into a clear, simple policy + staff protocol

Provo City School District

✅ 2 in place ⚠️ 3 partial ❌ 0 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy⚠️
Warrant Requirement
Front Office Protocol⚠️
Student Privacy
Family Communication⚠️
Next step: Improve visibility + simple staff instructions

Canyons School District

✅ 1 in place ⚠️ 4 partial ❌ 0 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy⚠️
Warrant Requirement⚠️
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy⚠️
Family Communication⚠️
Next step: Make policies clear and public-facing

Even in the best Utah districts, gaps remain.

Tier 1 districts have made meaningful progress, but no Utah district has a complete protective policy. Every one of them can still be pushed further — and Tier 2 and Tier 3 districts are largely starting from scratch.

In Utah, every protection that exists is the result of local organizing. The school board in your district can act right now.

⚠️
Tier 2 — Partial Protections These districts typically have student privacy protections in place but lack formal policies, written protocols, or staff training. They are reachable targets for structured advocacy.

Jordan School District

✅ 1 in place ⚠️ 0 partial ❌ 4 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy
Warrant Requirement
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy
Family Communication
Next step: Add a warrant requirement + simple public statement + parent communication

Davis School District

✅ 0 in place ⚠️ 2 partial ❌ 3 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy
Warrant Requirement
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy⚠️
Family Communication⚠️
Next step: Start with a warrant requirement + basic policy + reassurance to families

Cache School District

✅ 0 in place ⚠️ 2 partial ❌ 3 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy
Warrant Requirement
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy⚠️
Family Communication⚠️
Next step: Create a basic public policy with a warrant requirement

Weber School District

✅ 0 in place ⚠️ 1 partial ❌ 4 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy
Warrant Requirement
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy⚠️
Family Communication
Next step: Add warrant requirement + one-page policy + staff guidance

Tooele School District

✅ 0 in place ⚠️ 1 partial ❌ 4 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy
Warrant Requirement
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy⚠️
Family Communication
Next step: Start with a warrant requirement + public-facing communication

Washington County School District

✅ 0 in place ⚠️ 2 partial ❌ 3 missing
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy
Warrant Requirement
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy⚠️
Family Communication⚠️
Next step: Add a warrant requirement + clear public policy

Most Utah districts are starting from zero.

That is not a reason for despair — it is an opportunity. A school board that has never considered a warrant policy hasn't rejected it. The ask is to create something new, not to reverse an existing position.

The largest district in Utah — Alpine — has no public protective policy. It serves over 90,000 students. That is the single highest-impact organizing target in the state.

Tier 3 — Minimal or No Public Protections Most Utah districts fall here, including Alpine — the largest district in the state. All share essentially the same baseline: nothing formally in place.

All Remaining Districts

Alpine · Nebo · Ogden City · Murray · Box Elder · Iron · Wasatch · Park City · and others
ProtectionStatus
Public Policy
Warrant Requirement
Front Office Protocol
Student Privacy⚠️
Family Communication
Next step: Adopt a warrant requirement + written policy + front office protocol
Alpine School District priority: Alpine is the largest school district in Utah and among the 50 largest in the country, serving over 90,000 students. A policy adoption here would be transformative. It is the single highest-impact organizing target in the state.
← Back to Utah overview